Writing maintainable Object-Oriented (OO) JavaScript will save you money and make you popular. Don't believe me"codetitle">复制代码 代码如下:
// Define the Employee class
function Employee(num, fname, lname) {
this.getFullName = function () {
return fname + " " + lname;
}
};
// Instantiate an Employee object
var john = new Employee("4815162342", "John", "Doe");
alert("The employee's full name is " + john.getFullName());

There are three important things to note here:

I uppercased the first letter of my "class" function. That important distinction lets people know that it's for instantiation and not to be called as a normal function.
I use the new operator when instantiating. Leaving it out would simply call the function and result in problems.
Though getFullName is publicly available because it's assigned to the this operator, fname and lname are not. The closure created by the Employee function gives getFullName access to fname and lname while allowing them to remain private from everyone else.
Prototypal Inheritance
Now, here's an example of prototypal inheritance in JavaScript:
复制代码 代码如下:
// Define Human class
function Human() {
this.setName = function (fname, lname) {
this.fname = fname;
this.lname = lname;
}
this.getFullName = function () {
return this.fname + " " + this.lname;

}
}

// Define the Employee class
function Employee(num) {
this.getNum = function () {
return num;
}
};
// Let Employee inherit from Human
Employee.prototype = new Human();

// Instantiate an Employee object
var john = new Employee("4815162342");
john.setName("John", "Doe");
alert(john.getFullName() + "'s employee number is " + john.getNum());

This time, I've created a Human class which contains properties common to humans--I moved fname and lname there since all humans, not just employees have names. I then extended the Employee class by assigning a Human object to its prototype property.

Code Reuse Through Inheritance
In the previous example, I split the original Employee class in two. I moved out all the properties common to all humans into a Human class, and then caused Employee to inherit from Human. That way, the properties laid out in Human could be used by other objects such as Student, Client, Citizen, Visitor, etc... As you may have noticed by now, this is a great way to compartmentalize and reuse code. Rather than recreating all of those properties for every single type of object where we're dealing with a human being, we can just use what's already available by inheriting from Human. What's more, if we ever wanted to add a property like say, middle name, we'd do it once and it would immediately be available to everyone inheriting from Human. Conversely, if we only wanted to add a middle name property to just one object, we could do it directly in that object instead of adding it to Human.

Public and Private
I'd like to touch on the subject of public and private variables in classes. Depending on what you're doing with the data in an object, you'll want to either make it private or public. A private property doesn't necessarily mean that people won't have access to it. You may just want them to go through one of your methods first.

Read-only
Sometimes, you only want a value defined once at the moment the object is created. Once created, you don't want anyone changing that value. In order to do this, you create a private variable and have its value set on instantiation.

复制代码 代码如下:
function Animal(type) {
var data = [];
data['type'] = type;
this.getType = function () {
return data['type'];
}
}

var fluffy = new Animal('dog');
fluffy.getType(); // returns 'dog'

In this example, I create a local array called data within the Animal class. When an Animal object is instantiated, a value for type is passed and set in the data array. This value can't be overwritten as it's private (the Animal function defines its scope). The only way to read the type value once an object is instantiated is to call the getType method that I've explicitly exposed. Since getType is defined inside Animal, it has access to data by virtue of the closure created by Animal. This way, people can read the object's type but not change it.

It's important to note that the "read-only" technique will not work when an object is inherited from. Every object instantiated after the inheritance is performed will share those read-only variables and overwrite each other's values. The simplest solution is to convert the read-only variables in the class to public ones. If however, you must keep them private, you can employ the technique pointed out by Philippe in the comments.

Public
There are times however, that you'll want to be able to read and write a property's value at will. To do that, you need to expose the property using the this operator.
复制代码 代码如下:
function Animal() {
this.mood = '';
}

var fluffy = new Animal();
fluffy.mood = 'happy';
fluffy.mood; // returns 'happy'

This time our Animal class exposes a property named mood which can be written to and read at will. You can equally assign a function to public properties like the getType function in the previous example. Just be careful not to assign a value to a property like getType or you'll destroy it with your value.

Completely Private
Finally, you might find yourself in scenarios where you need a local variable that's completely private. In this case, you can use the same pattern as the first example and just not create a public method for people to access it.
复制代码 代码如下:
function Animal() {
var secret = "You'll never know!"
}
var fluffy = new Animal();

Writing a Flexible API
Now that we've covered class creation, we need to future proof them in order to keep up with product requirement changes. If you've done any project work, or maintained a product long-term, you know that requirements change. It's a fact of life. To think otherwise is to doom your code to obsolescence before it's even written. You may suddenly have to animate your tab content, or have it fetch data via an Ajax call. Though it's impossible to truly predict the future, it is possible to write code that's flexible enough to be reasonably future proof.

Saner Parameter Lists
One place where future-proofing can be done is when designing parameter lists. They're the main point of contact for people implementing your code and can be problematic if not well designed. What you want to avoid are parameter lists like this:
复制代码 代码如下:
function Person(employeeId, fname, lname, tel, fax, email, email2, dob) {
};

This class is very fragile. If you want to add a middle name parameter once you've released the code, you're going to have to do it at the very end of the list since order matters. That makes it awkward to work with. It also makes it difficult to work with if you don't have values for each parameter. For example:
复制代码 代码如下:
var ara = new Person(1234, "Ara", "Pehlivanian", "514-555-1234", null, null, null, "1976-05-17");

A cleaner, more flexible way of approaching parameter lists is to use this pattern:
复制代码 代码如下:
function Person(employeeId, data) {
};

The first parameter is there because it's required. The rest is lumped together in an object which can be very flexible to work with.
复制代码 代码如下:
var ara = new Person(1234, {
fname: "Ara",
lname: "Pehlivanian",
tel: "514-555-1234",
dob: "1976-05-17"
});

The beauty of this pattern is that it's both easy to read and highly flexible. Note how fax, email and email2 were completely left out. Also, since objects aren't order specific, adding a middle name parameter is as easy as throwing it in wherever it's convenient:
复制代码 代码如下:
var ara = new Person(1234, {
fname: "Ara",
mname: "Chris",
lname: "Pehlivanian",
tel: "514-555-1234",
dob: "1976-05-17"
});

The code inside the class doesn't care because the values get accessed by index like so:
复制代码 代码如下:
function Person(employeeId, data) {
this.fname = data['fname'];
};

If data['fname'] returns a value, it gets set. Otherwise, it doesn't, and nothing breaks.

Make It Pluggable
As time goes on, product requirements might demand additional behavior from your classes. Yet often times that behavior has absolutely nothing to do with your class's core functionality. It's also likely that it's a requirement for only one implementation of the class, like fading in the contents of one tab's panel while fetching external data for another. You may be tempted to put those abilities inside your class, but they don't belong there. A tab strip's responsibility is to manage tabs. Animation and data fetching are two completely separate things and should be kept outside the tab strip's code. The only way to future proof your tab strip and keep all that extra functionality external, is to allow people to plug behaviors into your code. In other words, allow people to hook into key moments in your code by creating events like onTabChange, afterTabChange, onShowPanel, afterShowPanel and so on. That way, they can easily hook into your onShowPanel event, write a handler that fades in the contents of that panel and everyone is happy. JavaScript libraries allow you to do this easily enough, but it's not too hard to work it out on your own. Here's a simple example using YUI 3.
复制代码 代码如下:
<script type="text/javascript" src="/UploadFiles/2021-04-02/combo"> <script type="text/javascript">
YUI().use('event', function (Y) {

function TabStrip() {
this.showPanel = function () {
this.fire('onShowPanel');

// Code to show the panel
this.fire('afterShowPanel');
};
};

// Give TabStrip the ability to fire custom events
Y.augment(TabStrip, Y.EventTarget);
var ts = new TabStrip();

// Set up custom event handlers for this instance of TabStrip
ts.on('onShowPanel', function () {
//Do something before showing panel
});
ts.on('onShowPanel', function () {
//Do something else before showing panel
});
ts.on('afterShowPanel', function () {
//Do something after showing panel
});

ts.showPanel();
});
</script>

This example has a simple TabStrip class with a showPanel method. The method fires two events, onShowPanel and afterShowPanel. It's given the ability to do so by augmenting the class with Y.EventTarget. Once that's done, we instantiate a TabStrip object and assign a bunch of event handlers to it. This is our custom code for handling this instance's unique behavior without messing with the actual class.

Summary
If you plan on reusing code either on the same page, website or across multiple projects, consider packaging and organizing it in classes. Object-oriented JavaScript lends itself naturally to better code organization and reuse. What's more, with a little forethought, you can make sure that your code is flexible enough to stay in use long after you've written it. Writing reusable, future-proof JavaScript will save you, your team and your company time and money. That's sure to make you popular.

这本书比较适合有一定javascipt代码基础，但是需要提高代码规范性的开发人员看

个人的收获：

1.书写代码 的规范性

@书写要合理缩进

@行太长时，要记得换行，并注意下一行缩进

@空行，对每一个逻辑分支，以模块进行注释

@变量的命名以驼峰形式，统一 规范命名

@===与==的用法要注意，能用===时一定不要用==，异步的我们要与开发确认好数据的类型

@双括号要有适当空格，提高阅读性

@ switch case要用缩进一下，并用break结束

2.css与html，js分离

在html里最好不要内联，要使用外联形式，display内联是可以使用的

标签里不要内联事件，做好JS事件和标签分离

在脚本里面用css，最好用classname.不要直接写一些样式。做好css和js的分离

3.try catch

捕获错误，好处可以看到哪个地方出现了问题，能及时发现，减少调试的时间，要充分利用组件中的报错机制

4.配置文件config的新建和分离

配置一些常量及值，或者是一些message文本信息